Showing posts with label London 2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label London 2012. Show all posts

Sunday, 29 July 2012

Play Sport, Not Politics

Our sporting rivalry with the Brits is famous. The Ashes, on the track, the road…whenever we can, we go up to bat against the Mother Country in the hopes of returning home victorious.

So it seems odd that the Australian Olympic Committee has knowingly handicapped the Australian cycling team’s chances of a gold medal, in either the time trial or the road race. The road race course is billed as a sprinter’s course, and the best sprinter in the world is, of course, Britain’s Mark Cavendish. The race for second is always heated, but Australia’s Matt Goss is always up there giving it his best shot. The obvious choice for the road race would therefore be Goss, and the obvious choice to lead him out would be Mark Renshaw, billed as the best leadout man in the world – and conveniently Australian.

Well, the selectors got Goss right, but it seems to have somehow slipped their minds that Renshaw was available to take ‘Gossy’ to the finishing line. Renshaw was left out of the Australian World Championships team for 2011 as well, sparking speculation that Renshaw is being deliberately shunned. The 29-year-old is known for being a bit explosive and controversial – he was sent home from the 2010 Tour de France after a well-publicised headbutting incident with Kiwi Julian Dean. It has also been posited that Renshaw’s signing with the Dutch team Rabobank rather than the new Australian team Orica-GreenEDGE is the reason the sprinter has been left out of the Worlds and Olympic teams. Interestingly enough, of the five riders selected for the Olympic team, Stuart O’Grady, Matt Goss and Simon Gerrans all ride for Orica-GreenEDGE, Cadel Evans is the first Australian winner of the Tour de France, and Michael Rogers is an all-around Australian favourite. In saying that, almost half of the Australian pros are signed to GreenEDGE, so a certain amount of GreenEDGE-domination is to be expected.

But there’s another glaring omission in the Australian roster – and a GreenEDGE one at that. Luke Durbridge is the reigning Australian time trial champion, and in particular the only Australian to have beaten Bradley Wiggins in a time trial while Wiggins has been in his current brilliant form. 21-year-old Durbridge won the time trial prologue of the Critérium du Dauphiné just prior to the Tour de France ahead of riders like Wiggins, World Time Trial Champion Tony Martin, French National Time Trial Champion Sylvain Chavanel and, yes, Cadel Evans. Granted, Durbridge is young, but his time-trialling abilities speak for themselves, and he’s proven himself as a domestique throughout his debut season with GreenEDGE.

So why aren’t Renshaw and Durbridge on the team, then? In fact, why is there only one pure sprinter on the team – Gossy – when Australia boasts a pretty good arsenal of sprinters like Heinrich Haussler or Adam Hansen who could help Gossy give Mark Cavendish a run for his money? Australia’s team is simply not geared towards winning a gold medal; rather, each appointment to the team was a political move to pacify and acknowledge Australian cycling’s heads of state. It’s a noble intention, certainly, but someone needs to tell the AOC and Cycling Australia that the Olympic Games is the wrong place for playing politics.

Tuesday, 26 June 2012

Balancing the Scales of Justice

It wasn't exactly what the clean and untarnished world of Australian cycling hoped to wake up to on June 20th. Stars of the track, professional road cyclists and Olympic gold medal hopefuls Jack Bobridge and Michael Hepburn were involved in what's being described by the media as a 'drink-driving incident' in northern Spain. Involved in a 'minor' car park collision while under the influence of alcohol, though no other cars were involved and no-one was hurt, Bobridge was fined $2,500 by Cycling Australia, $2,000 of which is suspended, and placed on a 12-month good behaviour bond, as well as being fined 700 euros ($880) by a Spanish court, while Hepburn received a 12-month good behaviour bond and $1,000 suspended fine. Without being sanctioned by the Australian Olympic Committee (AOC), both riders will compete as usual in the team pursuit in London, where Australia and Great Britain will once again take up their fierce rivalry for gold.

But is the penalty too light? The AOC recently handed down a much harsher penalty to so-called 'bad-boy' swimmers Nick D'Arcy and Kenrick Monk, which will force the troublesome duo to fly home directly after competing in their Olympic events, missing the Closing Ceremony and the celebrations that ensue. Granted, both swimmers have been in trouble with the police before - D'Arcy was actually excluded from the 2008 Beijing Olympics for beating a fellow swimmer in a bar brawl - but most people would suggest that the punishment should be proportional to the crime. D'Arcy and Monk posting pictures on Facebook of themselves posing with high-powered guns in an arms shop during a training camp in America shows them to be guilty of bad taste, certainly, but guilty of breaking no laws in either Australia or America - except for those of decency. Drink-driving, however, is not only illegal in both Australia and Spain but also endangers the lives of the driver, passengers and any other road users.  Of all road users, cyclists should be the most aware of the consequences of poor driving.

One has to wonder what was taken into consideration when the AOC chose not to impose their own penalty on top of the one handed down by Cycling Australia. Did they consider that without Bobridge and Hepburn, Australia's 50/50 chance at a gold medal in the team pursuit goes down the drain? Did they take into account the otherwise squeaky clean records covered in wins, deem it a mistake and decide to give them a second chance? Did they ponder the penitence of the pair, now training hard for the Olympics at the national training camp? How about the serious nature of the offence, and the fact that committing a criminal offence violates Cycling Australia's disciplinary code? And did anyone mention the sanctions of D'Arcy and Monk as a barometer?

It must be confessed that cycling's administration isn't known for its consistency - the stringent enforcing of usually lax rules at the 2012 Track World Championships, or the controversial banning of Alberto Contador for doping while other riders were let off on technicalities - but there are likely some shaking heads amongst the rest of the Australian Olympic team, as well as the general public. It seems a little hard to believe - and more than a little unfair - that D'Arcy and Monk will have to board a plane during the Olympics afterparty for a bad use of social media, while their teammate with a drink-driving conviction joins in all the festivities - albeit without the alcohol, which the cyclist pair are now forbidden from drinking while with the national team. The AOC declined to penalise Bobridge and Hepburn following their court sanctions and the Cycling Australia verdict, deciding they'd been punished enough, but now would be a great time for them to step in and play Lady Justice, balancing the scales to ensure that the penalties handed down to our Olympic athletes have been delivered with consistency.